Mudjacking vs polyjacking. We quote both.
Both raise concrete by filling the void under the slab. Mudjacking pumps a cement-based slurry. Polyjacking pumps expanding polyurethane foam. The right one depends on the slab, access, lift height, and who can get there. Not a brand fight.
A practical fix for settled concrete.
Both raise concrete by filling the void under the slab.
Mudjacking pumps a cement-based slurry.
Mudjacking
Economical on larger lifts. Sound slabs. Standard access. Drill holes, pump, lift, patch.
Polyjacking
Lighter material. Often smaller holes. Tight access or a slab where extra weight is a problem. A specialist has to say if foam is the better fit.
Honest split
Neither is always better. Foam is not a miracle. Slurry is not old junk. Wisconsin freeze-thaw punishes a bad lift either way. Over-lifting cracks a slab in both methods.
We match you with independent contractors who do mud, foam, or both. You are not buying a one-method pitch from this site.
Don't lift junk.
Crumbling, too thin, or you already wanted a new layout. Then pour.
Full Replacement
- Crumbling concrete
- Too thin to lift
- You already wanted a new layout. Then pour. Don't lift junk.
Mudjacking / Leveling
- Sound slabs with settlement, not crumbling
- Mudjacking when the lift is larger and access is standard
- Foam when holes need to stay small or extra weight is a problem
Common questions.
Straight answers before you request a quote.
Ask your question →01 Is polyurethane foam better than mudjacking? +
02 When should concrete be replaced instead of raised? +
Fix sunken concrete,
not your budget.
Share a short description of your project. A local concrete leveling specialist will review your request and respond with a quote - usually the same day.